At this agriculture journal you keep the copyright to your own work. Articles are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 licence: anyone may download, reuse, modify and distribute the paper for non-commercial purposes with credit to you and to the journal. Commercial reuse needs prior permission and charges apply.
Most agriculture journal authors sign whatever the form says and find out what it meant years later, usually when they want to reuse their own figure. Ten minutes now saves that.
| Copyright | Licence | |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Ownership of the work | Permission granted to others |
| Who holds it here | You, the author | Granted by you, stated by the journal |
| Can it be given away? | Yes, by transfer — not required here | It is a grant, not a transfer |
| What it controls | Everything you may do with the work | What readers may do with it |
Keeping copyright while granting a licence is the arrangement at this agriculture journal. You have not given anything away; you have told the world what it may do.
That last condition distinguishes it from plain CC BY, which allows commercial use too. Commercial reuse of an article here is not covered by the licence: it requires prior permission from the journal, and charges apply. Exact terms are on the content licensing policy page.
Under a copyright transfer, several of those need the publisher’s permission. Authors are routinely surprised to need clearance to reuse a figure they drew.
In any agriculture journal the obligation runs both ways, and this is where authors most often create a problem for themselves.
| Source licence | Can you reuse it? | What you must do |
|---|---|---|
| CC BY | Yes, including commercially | Full attribution |
| CC BY-NC | Non-commercially | Full attribution |
| All rights reserved | Only with written permission | Obtain it before submitting, and say so |
| Your own earlier paper | Depends who holds the copyright | If transferred, you may need permission |
Redrawing a figure does not remove the obligation if the content is substantially the same — cite the source. And a photograph or map taken from a website is not automatically free to use; the absence of a licence statement means all rights reserved, not permission granted.
Attribution is not complicated, but it has to be complete. For a figure taken or adapted from another paper, the caption should carry all four elements:
Fig 4: Response of grain yield to nitrogen rate. Reproduced from [12] under a CC BY-NC 4.0 licence.
Or, where you have changed it:
Fig 4: Response of grain yield to nitrogen rate, adapted from [12] with permission.
Four things: what it is, where it came from, what you did to it, and under what permission. Missing the last one is the commonest omission, and it creates a problem after publication rather than before.
| Question | Answer here | Why it matters to you |
|---|---|---|
| Who owns the paper? | You | You can reuse it freely |
| Who may read it? | Anyone, immediately | No paywall between your work and its readers |
| Who may reuse it? | Anyone, non-commercially, with credit | Teaching, extension material, theses, further research |
| Who may sell it? | Nobody without permission | Commercial reuse needs clearance from the journal |
| Where can you put it? | Institutional or subject repository, personal page | Sherpa/Romeo Green policy |
| What identifies it? | A Crossref DOI, prefix 10.33545 | It stays citable and findable |
That combination — author-held copyright, immediate open access, non-commercial reuse and a registered DOI — is what an open access agriculture journal should offer. Worth checking against any journal you consider, because the four do not always come together.
If you hold the copyright this is straightforward: include it and cite the published version. If you transferred copyright to a different publisher for an earlier paper, check their thesis policy before pasting it in. Most permit it; some require a specific form of words.
This comes up constantly in agricultural research and is worth being clear about. Turning your findings into an extension leaflet, a training module or a departmental bulletin is reuse of your own work, and since you hold the copyright, you may do it.
The question that needs care is whether the material is commercial. A free bulletin issued by a university or a state department is not. The same content inside a paid training course sold by a private company is, and that needs prior permission from the journal under the CC BY-NC terms. If a co-author or a partner organisation expects to use the material commercially, settle it before publication rather than after.
Five questions, ten minutes, and none of them get easier to answer later.
Copyright is about ownership; authorship is about credit and accountability. Everyone listed as an author should have contributed to the work and be able to defend it, and everyone who contributed materially should be listed.
The problems that arise — a head of department added by convention who did not contribute, a field assistant omitted who did — are far easier to settle before submission than after. Agree the author list and the order while the paper is being written, not when it is being submitted.
One sentence is worth memorising for any journal you consider: who holds the copyright, and which licence applies? If a site cannot answer both in one place, that is itself informative.
Yes. Authors publishing in this agriculture journal retain ownership of the copyright of their own work. The journal does not require a copyright transfer, which differs from many subscription publishers.
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0. Readers may download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and copy the work for non-commercial purposes as long as the original authors and source are cited.
Any reuse for commercial advantage — reproducing an article in a paid training course, in a product brochure, or in material sold for profit. That is not covered by the licence and needs prior permission from the journal, with charges applying.
Yes. The journal allows authors to deposit versions of their work in an institutional or other repository of their choice, in line with the Sherpa/Romeo Green policy.
Yes, because you hold the copyright. This is one of the practical differences between retaining copyright and transferring it — under a transfer you can need permission to reuse your own figure.
Yes, unless its licence permits reuse. Check the licence of the source article and give full attribution either way.
How a themed issue fits the normal process:
Created by Rosa Delgado • 10 Aug 2026